2 replaced http://ux.stackexchange.com/ with https://ux.stackexchange.com/
source | link

Once upon a time, I made a post on heremade a post on here. It was about an interface that I used (and a lot of us use) and I thought wow this interface sucks! But then I thought wait, how would I do it better? Hey this interface is hard! I better ask some expertsask some experts.

I got some good answers. Most of them echoed the same basic principle of adding extra clicks to save screen space and, most importantly, group logical thought. That was cool. But the coolest thing was when the author of that tool noticed the question and fixed the terrible promptauthor of that tool noticed the question and fixed the terrible prompt.

I'm author of WinSCP and I've found this "question" really inspiring. Thanks.

And two weeks later, he said,

WinSCP 5.2.1 beta with the improved overwrite confirmation prompt was released yesterday.

So if you ask me? Abso-freaking-lutely we can call out brand or companies as a reference. If they care about their brand, they will recognize "hey, we didn't do it perfect, and thanks for your feedback". If it never comes to their attention, no harm no foul. If they see it and decide they aren't going to fix it, hopefully they tell us why and enlighten us as to their UX decision making process (probably involving budgets and cost-benefit analyses...)

Once upon a time, I made a post on here. It was about an interface that I used (and a lot of us use) and I thought wow this interface sucks! But then I thought wait, how would I do it better? Hey this interface is hard! I better ask some experts.

I got some good answers. Most of them echoed the same basic principle of adding extra clicks to save screen space and, most importantly, group logical thought. That was cool. But the coolest thing was when the author of that tool noticed the question and fixed the terrible prompt.

I'm author of WinSCP and I've found this "question" really inspiring. Thanks.

And two weeks later, he said,

WinSCP 5.2.1 beta with the improved overwrite confirmation prompt was released yesterday.

So if you ask me? Abso-freaking-lutely we can call out brand or companies as a reference. If they care about their brand, they will recognize "hey, we didn't do it perfect, and thanks for your feedback". If it never comes to their attention, no harm no foul. If they see it and decide they aren't going to fix it, hopefully they tell us why and enlighten us as to their UX decision making process (probably involving budgets and cost-benefit analyses...)

Once upon a time, I made a post on here. It was about an interface that I used (and a lot of us use) and I thought wow this interface sucks! But then I thought wait, how would I do it better? Hey this interface is hard! I better ask some experts.

I got some good answers. Most of them echoed the same basic principle of adding extra clicks to save screen space and, most importantly, group logical thought. That was cool. But the coolest thing was when the author of that tool noticed the question and fixed the terrible prompt.

I'm author of WinSCP and I've found this "question" really inspiring. Thanks.

And two weeks later, he said,

WinSCP 5.2.1 beta with the improved overwrite confirmation prompt was released yesterday.

So if you ask me? Abso-freaking-lutely we can call out brand or companies as a reference. If they care about their brand, they will recognize "hey, we didn't do it perfect, and thanks for your feedback". If it never comes to their attention, no harm no foul. If they see it and decide they aren't going to fix it, hopefully they tell us why and enlighten us as to their UX decision making process (probably involving budgets and cost-benefit analyses...)

1
source | link

Once upon a time, I made a post on here. It was about an interface that I used (and a lot of us use) and I thought wow this interface sucks! But then I thought wait, how would I do it better? Hey this interface is hard! I better ask some experts.

I got some good answers. Most of them echoed the same basic principle of adding extra clicks to save screen space and, most importantly, group logical thought. That was cool. But the coolest thing was when the author of that tool noticed the question and fixed the terrible prompt.

I'm author of WinSCP and I've found this "question" really inspiring. Thanks.

And two weeks later, he said,

WinSCP 5.2.1 beta with the improved overwrite confirmation prompt was released yesterday.

So if you ask me? Abso-freaking-lutely we can call out brand or companies as a reference. If they care about their brand, they will recognize "hey, we didn't do it perfect, and thanks for your feedback". If it never comes to their attention, no harm no foul. If they see it and decide they aren't going to fix it, hopefully they tell us why and enlighten us as to their UX decision making process (probably involving budgets and cost-benefit analyses...)