Timeline for Microcopy and copywriting are not the same thing
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2011 at 12:49 | comment | added | gef05 | Dammit, Rahul. Stop being so reasonable. :) | |
| Oct 5, 2011 at 14:27 | comment | added | Rahul Mod | I don't believe we can disagree :-) You're implying that I took Joshua's blog post to be gospel in my creation of the microcopy tag; I'm saying that's not correct. Instead, I'm explaining that I took his suggestion and used it because I think it's a good idea. | |
| Oct 5, 2011 at 14:01 | comment | added | gef05 | We'll have to disagree on that point, Rahul. | |
| Oct 5, 2011 at 13:31 | comment | added | Rahul Mod | Taking a useful suggestion from the community and using it as a descriptor isn't "reacting as though it is gospel". It's just a good idea for a way to describe something we do. | |
| Oct 5, 2011 at 13:14 | history | answered | gef05 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |