From what I see of the definitions pointed to here, I would propose to turn the synonyms around.

@Vitaly Mijiritsky commented that the classical definition of "copywriting" is mainly off-topic here.

@Patrick McElhaney said in his answer:

.. it seems all of our copywriting questions are about microcopy.

So maybe it should be that copywriting should be re-tagged to microcopy, and not the other way around?

So if it is actually "copywriting" the question is about, it should
not be tagged copywriting, but closed as off topic...

From what I see of the definitions pointed to here, I would propose to turn the synonyms around.

@Vitaly Mijiritsky commented that the classical definition of "copywriting" is mainly off-topic here.

@Patrick McElhaney said in his answer:

.. it seems all of our copywriting questions are about microcopy.

So maybe it should be that copywriting should be re-tagged to microcopy, and not the other way around?

So if it is actually "copywriting" the question is about, it should
not be tagged copywriting, but closed as off topic...

From what I see of the definitions pointed to here, I would propose to turn the synonyms around.

@Vitaly Mijiritsky commented that the classical definition of "copywriting" is mainly off-topic here.

@Patrick McElhaney said in his answer:

.. it seems all of our copywriting questions are about microcopy.

So maybe it should be that copywriting should be re-tagged to microcopy, and not the other way around?

From what I see of the definitions pointed to here, I would propose to turn the synonyms around.

@Vitaly Mijiritsky commented that the classical definition of "copywriting" is mainly off-topic here.

@Patrick McElhaney said in his answer:

.. it seems all of our copywriting questions are about microcopy.

So maybe it should be that copywriting should be re-tagged to microcopy, and not the other way around?

So if it is actually "copywriting" the question is about, it should
not be tagged copywriting, but closed as off topic...