The tag doesn't sound like one we need, because this site is all about UX itself. Should it be removed?

  • 1
    Hrm I could have swore we nuked this exact tag or something very much like it a while ago. My vote's definitely to blacklist it
    – Ben Brocka
    Sep 22, 2014 at 18:14
  • Related: Is “website-design” a useful tag? Sep 23, 2014 at 19:28
  • 1
    @Ben, maybe you're thinking of user-interaction Sep 23, 2014 at 19:29
  • This question is now a 'Hot Meta Post' but moderators haven't removed the tag yet, even though everyone agrees it should be nuked. When will it be deleted? Probably in 6 to 8 weeks...
    – William
    Oct 1, 2014 at 12:37
  • @BenBrocka or another moderator, when is this tag going to be nuked?
    – William
    Oct 2, 2014 at 16:02
  • @WilliamDavidEdwards Mods individually don't have the power to nuke a tag as that requires blacklisting the input to prevent it being suggested again in future. And blacklisting entries is quite a drastic step only performed by the stack exchange community team. But we can contact them should we need to if they don't pick up on such issues in meta (but we're all sorted here now anyway).
    – JonW Mod
    Oct 3, 2014 at 21:26

3 Answers 3


has been burned and blacklisted.

There's some cleanup work to do: .

  • Thanks :) I also see this is no longer a 'suggested' tag.
    – William
    Oct 3, 2014 at 6:08

Yes, it should be removed because it doesn't add anything. On-topic questions here are about UX anyway, so is unneeded.


The only reason to keep it that I can see is to differentiate these questions from ones dealing with ux research... But we don't really get a whole lot of those. I say nuke it.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .