Timeline for Should tool-related questions be on-topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2021 at 15:41 | comment | added | Izquierdo | Figma questions keep coming into the Close queue. UX StackExchange seems like the logical place for a new Figma user to ask those questions, and it seems unfriendly to keep shutting them down. But, to JonW's point, they would definitely take over the discussion. I think we need to solve this, too. | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://graphicdesign.stackexchange.com/ with https://graphicdesign.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://photo.stackexchange.com/ with https://photo.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:22 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 30, 2013 at 13:50 | answer | added | DA01 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 28, 2012 at 16:17 | answer | added | Chris Reynolds | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 4, 2012 at 19:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackUX/status/276038691204513793 | ||
| Dec 4, 2012 at 11:57 | answer | added | JohnGBMod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 4, 2012 at 11:34 | comment | added | kontur | I think @Rahul as a valid point. Wordpress questions are known to pop up on stackoverflow, and where specific more to Wordpress than to web/programming in general, they get transfered. However, many other "subtopics" on SO are kept there. Ultimately the topics at hand here are overlapping and a wider perspective is something people are likely to profit from rather than getting negatively impacted by. If the focus of a question is on the coding part and not the UX part, it should be moved. Otherwise, it could be of interest to other users here. | |
| Dec 3, 2012 at 13:30 | comment | added | Rahul Mod | How about we just keep growing until we're so relevant and irreplaceable to designers that tool developers approach us asking if they can use our site as a place to answer questions about their tool, similarly to how Microsoft, Facebook, etc. now use Stack Overflow to answer questions. If Balsamiq approached us with that kind of question I doubt any of us would have a problem with it :-) | |
| Nov 30, 2012 at 21:32 | answer | added | Charles Wesley | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 30, 2012 at 19:37 | answer | added | JonWMod | timeline score: 13 | |
| Nov 30, 2012 at 19:10 | history | asked | Vitaly Mijiritsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |