Timeline for Should critique requests be allowed on the site?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2011 at 23:52 | comment | added | Lee Whitney III | @Glen - Awesome man, total respect for that. | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 22:07 | comment | added | Glen Lipka | @Lee: Better now? | |
| Sep 7, 2011 at 13:35 | comment | added | Lee Whitney III | Highly productive comments here, lets see if we can get more of these. | |
| Jan 26, 2011 at 19:52 | comment | added | Charles Boyung | I honestly hope you don't believe that being invited to speak at conferences means that you are competent. I would say that for every good speaker there are at least two very bad speakers. And I'm quite sure you fall into the latter grouping. | |
| Jan 7, 2011 at 19:06 | comment | added | Charles Boyung | As for your points being higher than mine? You clearly spend a ton more time on these sites than I do. I'm too busy doing actual work. I guess you don't have that sort of problem. I'd much rather have lots of happy clients because I actually get their work done for them than a high vote count on some website that has no value to said clients whatsoever. Since you whine whenever you get downvoted and when you think about losing your rep when a site dies out and gets replaced, we clearly have different priorities in life. Best of luck being successful with your "high rep". | |
| Jan 7, 2011 at 19:04 | comment | added | Charles Boyung | Sure, Glen, that's it. Your bias against negative votes is quite well known. Just because you choose to misuse a system doesn't mean everyone does. I vote things down when they are flat out wrong. If you've got a problem with that, then you REALLY don't belong on these sites. And I'm not good at UX, that is really funny coming from you. I've read your comments here and on UXExchange and I've even looked at your godawful blog. You are a complete and total moron when it comes to UX. I honestly have no idea how you've survived as long as you have in the field. | |
| Jan 6, 2011 at 14:03 | comment | added | Charles Boyung | Oh, and if most people WANT your type of subjective questions, then why did your answer here get zero votes and the other answer here, which shoots down subjective critique questions, has gotten four votes? Seems to me YOU'RE the one in the minority here. | |
| Jan 6, 2011 at 14:01 | comment | added | Charles Boyung | REALLY??? Most people on the site disagree with me? That's why people are repeatedly voting to close these types of questions? Yeah, that makes perfect sense. As for voting down everything you post - sorry, isn't me. I only vote down the posts you make that are completely stupid and wrong. Now, that may be a large number of your posts, but not even close to a majority of what you post. | |
| Jan 5, 2011 at 20:05 | comment | added | Charles Boyung | Glen, if you like subjective questions so much, then why don't you just go to a UI discussion forum? As I've stated many times to you before - you want open ended discussion, and the stack exchange platform is NOT the place for open ended discussion. | |
| Dec 12, 2010 at 15:49 | history | answered | Glen Lipka | CC BY-SA 2.5 |